Поиск статей
-
GENESIS AND EVOLUTION OF PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION EXECUTION BY IN-VESTIGATORY GROUP
Description
In the scientific and educational literature, execution of preliminary investigation by investigatory group and investigatory-operative group is shown in detail enough. Absence of the instructions about interaction between investigatory and operatively-search divisions at a group method of investigation in the criminally remedial law, has caused necessity of search of concrete and optimum forms of interaction in practice. The author defines some such forms which are described in the scientific article taking into account occurrence, formation and perfection of activity of investigatory and investigatory-operative group
-
LEGALITY OF THE PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION AGENCIES REGULATIONS
Description
The legal entities of the preliminary investigation agencies that are authorized to make decisions and draw regulations at this stage are an investigator, a detective, the Head of the investigative division, the supervisor of the investigative body, a prosecutor. The requirement for the legality of the regulations issued by the above-mentioned legal entities develops with the initiation of the criminal case. Such requirement is applied to the decisions made by an investigator or a detective under the common rule
-
APPLICATION OF PROOFS IN REMEDIAL DECISIONS AT THE STAGE OF INITIATION OF CRIMINAL CASE
Description
A conclusion may be drawn, based on the analysis of allowability of criminal-procedural evidences which include legitimacy of the source of information relating to the facts and ways of obtaining and fixation of information mentioned in the order stipulated by the code of criminal procedure
-
Description
The article covers the following problems: delineation, prevention, suppression and detection of crimes as well as the detection and identification of the criminals who prepare, organize and commit crimes; search of fugitive suspects and people who holeup and abscond and dodge the responsibility as well as search of missing people; obtaining information about the events and activity (negligence) causing national, military, economical and environmental security threat of the Russian Federation; determination of the forfeitable property. The author suggests some solutions for the mentioned problems.
-
PARTICULARITY OF THE ESTIMATION OF EXPERT'S STATEMENT
Description
In accordance with the Article 17 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, expert evidence is not of the predetermined force for a detective, an investigator, a prosecutor, a judge and a jury. However, historically it is actually estimated as specific evidence different from the other. As early as before the revolution in Russia a court expert was considered to be a scientific judge. An expert is a judge of the facts whose evidence on the case is not actually estimated along with the other types of evidence
-
ASSESSMENT OF EVIDENCE SUFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT BY COURT WITH CASE AT BAR
Description
There were presented the results of research carried out by the author in the article, that is assessment of trustworthiness of evidence with case at bar. The author drew a conclusion about necessity of criminal- commitment procedure legislature improvement, in particular, pronouncement of sentence in the case of rejection of public prosecutor from maintenance of accusation in court on the basis of scientific and special literature, in particular, works of O.L.Vasilieva,Yu.K.Orlova, A.E. Merkusheva, P.A. Lupinskaya, V.Zazhitsky, I.B. Mikhailovsky, I.L. Petrukhina et al and with an account of published and unpublished jurisdiction.
-
REPRESENTATION OF PROOFS BY PARTICIPANTS OF CRIMINAL TRIAL AT THE PROCEEDING STAGE
Description
The competitiveness principle is answered to the full with a situation when proofs the charge party at first represents, then - the protection party, and each of them proves legitimacy of the conclusion and criticises arguments of the opponent. The court definitively should solve, what proofs to reject and what to accept and to pronounce on their basis the sentence. Meanwhile in a criminal trial science separate authors believe, that research of proofs in competitive order practically appears impracticable. The article of the author is devoted to these and other problems
-
FACTORS LIMITING REMEDIAL INDEPENDENCE OF INVESTIGATOR
Description
In this scientific article, the author considers the main problems, concluding in following: in the course of realization of the checking and control not to leave for determined limit, ungrounded not to limit remedial independence of investigator. After all public prosecutor, chief of the subdivision inquiry, court, realizing remedial checking and control, simultaneously must work out beside investigator independence, professionalism, skills to take the faithful decisions on base of the analysis to investigation situation
pdf 132.649kb
doc 132.649kb