№ 158(4), April, 2020
Public date: 30.04.2020
Archive of journal: Articles count 21, 65 kb
-
Description
We took 20 samples of centralized water for bacteriological studies at two farms of the collective farm “Limann” and the collective farm “50 years of the name of the October Revolution” of the Neklinovsky District of the Russian Federation and sent to the Rostov Regional Veterinary Laboratory. Thus, according to the results of laboratory studies of water, it was found that in the first farm in 7 samples out of 10 under No. 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, common coliform bacteria were found (the number of bacteria in 100 ml according to MUK 4.2. 1018-01), as well as thermo-tolerant coliform bacteria (the number of bacteria per 100 ml according to MUK 4.2.1018-01), in the second farm in 5 samples out of 10 under No. 3, 4, 5, 7, 8 common coliform bacteria (number of bacteria per 100 ml according to MUK 4.2.1018-01), as well as thermo-tolerant coliform bacteria (number of bacteria per 100 ml according to MUK 4.2.1018-01). According to the results of studies using the rapid test "Biocontrol" revealed that in the first farm in 2 samples out of 10 under No. 4.9 per 1 ml of bacteria 105, which indicates water pollution, and in 5 out of 10 samples No. 1, 2, 5, 8, 10 per 1 ml of bacteria 107, which indicates a strong pollution of water and is the basis for the prohibition of watering animals. In the second household, in 3 samples out of 10 under No. 4, 5, 8 per 1 ml of bacteria 105, which indicates water pollution, and in 2 out of 10 samples No. 3, 7 per 1 ml of bacteria 107, which indicates severe water pollution which is not recommended for animals. Thus, the studied water samples by the bacteriological method coincide with the “Biocontrol” rapid tests, which makes it possible to practically use it in farms