name
Groshev Alexander Vasilyevich
Scholastic degree
•
Academic rank
—
Honorary rank
—
Organization, job position
• Kuban State Agrarian University
профессор кафедры уголовного права КубГАУ
Research interests
уголовное право и криминология, соучастие в преступлении, должностные преступления
Web site url
—
Current rating (overall rating of articles)
0
TOP5 co-authors
Articles count: 2
Сформировать список работ, опубликованных в Научном журнале КубГАУ
-
BOOK-ENTRY SECURITIES AS THE SUBJECT OF THEFT
DescriptionBook-entry securities as the subject of theft. The article deals with the questions of legal assessment of crimes, targeted at embezzlement of book-entry securities. The article reports author's position concerning the expediency of creation in Russian criminal law system, the criminal liability for book-entry security taking in articles about theft and property crimes. The plot of the article requires the discussion in terms of recognizing book-entry securities the subject of theft, and creation of criminal liability for the illegal taking of book-entry securities. The research of legal assessment of book-entry securities theft is well-reasoned by top scientists, cases of court practice, and gives an assumption to consider bookentry security as a subject of theft. Moreover, current level of property relations, material and non- material values put into trade turnover, including objects that have an informational character, and do not possess any material characteristics, attest how important is to recognize non-material thing the subject of theft
-
Description
The article is devoted to the analysis of the legislation on criminal liability for acquisition, storage, transportation, processing for sale or it is sold obviously illegally prepared wood. It is investigated the main and qualifying signs of the corpus delicti provided by Art. 191.1 of the criminal code of Russian Federation, and features of legislative technology of creation of norm on responsibility for this crime. Some problems of qualification of the specified crime and its separation from adjacent structures of crimes are noted