Поиск статей
-
PSYCOLINGUISTIC FOUNDATION OF THE STRUCTURE OF THE “CREATIVITY” CONCEPTOSPHERE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE
10.00.00 Philological sciences
DescriptionThis article deals with the examination of the peculiarities of the conceptual sphere of “CREATIVITY” using the cognitive approach to the language study. Key concepts of this conceptosphere are defined and lexemes that represent it are analyzed
-
PECULIARITIES OF THE FRAME “MANAGEMENT” REPRESENTATION ON THE SYNTACTICAL LEVEL
10.00.00 Philological sciences
DescriptionThe article deals with the main types of semantic and syntactic constructions formed by the verbs with the meaning of management in the contemporary English language. Correlation and interrelation between vocabulary used in the syntactic models with these verbs and syntactic structures proper formed by the verbs of management while activating the frame are also analyzed.
-
ESSENCE, MEANING AND SUBJECTS OF REPRESENTATION OF EVIDENCES ON CRIMINAL CASES
DescriptionThe author makes the substantiated conclusion on representation of evidences as one of the ways of evidences, which are in voluntary actions of subjects, possessing with significant information for criminal case. The author notes that in addition with state prosecutor, defender and other concerned participants of criminal legal procedure, any citizens, officials, enterprises, institutions and organizations can submit any written documents and subjects for their union to the case as evidences.
-
PECULIARITIES OF VERBALIZATION OF THE FRAME “MANAGEMENT” BY MARGINAL VERBS
10.00.00 Philological sciences
DescriptionThis article deals with some peculiarities of verbalization of the frame “management” by the verbs of other semantic groups. Interrelation and crossing of the frame “management” with other frames is also analyzed
-
REPRESENTATION OF PROOFS BY PARTICIPANTS OF CRIMINAL TRIAL AT THE PROCEEDING STAGE
DescriptionThe competitiveness principle is answered to the full with a situation when proofs the charge party at first represents, then - the protection party, and each of them proves legitimacy of the conclusion and criticises arguments of the opponent. The court definitively should solve, what proofs to reject and what to accept and to pronounce on their basis the sentence. Meanwhile in a criminal trial science separate authors believe, that research of proofs in competitive order practically appears impracticable. The article of the author is devoted to these and other problems