Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russian Federation
Author list of organization
List of articles written by the authors of the organization
- Description
- Description
-
CALCULATION OF WARMING IN PRELIMINARY DEFORMED RUBBER CYLINDER AT HARMONIOUS LOADING
DescriptionIn the present article the problem about harmonious loading of preliminary compressed rubber cylinder is solved on the basis of the defining parities received during work
-
Description
Mechanism of evidence collection by suspect, accused, victim, civil suer and defendant, legislator is not reflected in full extent in criminal- procedure legislation of Russia. The CPC does not reflect the order of presentation of collected evidences. So, problems of evidence assessment are occurred from the point of view of correct ways and order of their receiving on the stage of criminal case sue. This article is devoted to these aspects.
-
ESSENCE, MEANING AND SUBJECTS OF REPRESENTATION OF EVIDENCES ON CRIMINAL CASES
DescriptionThe author makes the substantiated conclusion on representation of evidences as one of the ways of evidences, which are in voluntary actions of subjects, possessing with significant information for criminal case. The author notes that in addition with state prosecutor, defender and other concerned participants of criminal legal procedure, any citizens, officials, enterprises, institutions and organizations can submit any written documents and subjects for their union to the case as evidences.
-
ASSESSMENT OF EVIDENCE SUFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT BY COURT WITH CASE AT BAR
DescriptionThere were presented the results of research carried out by the author in the article, that is assessment of trustworthiness of evidence with case at bar. The author drew a conclusion about necessity of criminal- commitment procedure legislature improvement, in particular, pronouncement of sentence in the case of rejection of public prosecutor from maintenance of accusation in court on the basis of scientific and special literature, in particular, works of O.L.Vasilieva,Yu.K.Orlova, A.E. Merkusheva, P.A. Lupinskaya, V.Zazhitsky, I.B. Mikhailovsky, I.L. Petrukhina et al and with an account of published and unpublished jurisdiction.
-
Description
The analysis of civil-law norms provided in the fourth part of civil procedure law of Russia allows to express opinion that apprehended and embodied by civil procedure law in sphere of regulation of the right to results of intellectual activity and individualization instruments in the criminal law is not reflected in full, in particular, in article 146 of the criminal code of Russian Federation.
-
REPRESENTATION OF PROOFS BY PARTICIPANTS OF CRIMINAL TRIAL AT THE PROCEEDING STAGE
DescriptionThe competitiveness principle is answered to the full with a situation when proofs the charge party at first represents, then - the protection party, and each of them proves legitimacy of the conclusion and criticises arguments of the opponent. The court definitively should solve, what proofs to reject and what to accept and to pronounce on their basis the sentence. Meanwhile in a criminal trial science separate authors believe, that research of proofs in competitive order practically appears impracticable. The article of the author is devoted to these and other problems
-
FACTORS LIMITING REMEDIAL INDEPENDENCE OF INVESTIGATOR
DescriptionIn this scientific article, the author considers the main problems, concluding in following: in the course of realization of the checking and control not to leave for determined limit, ungrounded not to limit remedial independence of investigator. After all public prosecutor, chief of the subdivision inquiry, court, realizing remedial checking and control, simultaneously must work out beside investigator independence, professionalism, skills to take the faithful decisions on base of the analysis to investigation situation
-
PARTICULARITY OF THE ESTIMATION OF EXPERT'S STATEMENT
DescriptionIn accordance with the Article 17 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, expert evidence is not of the predetermined force for a detective, an investigator, a prosecutor, a judge and a jury. However, historically it is actually estimated as specific evidence different from the other. As early as before the revolution in Russia a court expert was considered to be a scientific judge. An expert is a judge of the facts whose evidence on the case is not actually estimated along with the other types of evidence