12.00.00 Law sciences
-
Description
This article is important today because there is not enough attention in the contemporary law publications paid to the typical patterns of crime mechanism especially in the sphere of illegal weapon and ammunition turnover. Taking into account the opinions of such well-known forensic scientists as R.S. Belkin, V.D. Zelensky, G.M. Meretukov, M.V. Golovin, V.A. Obraztsov, J.G. Korukhov, V.Y. Koldin, O.V. Chelysheva, L.Y. Drapkin, V.N. Karagodin and others, the author comes to the conclusion that it’s necessary to develop typical patterns of crime mechanism for certain types of crime. The author has worked out some typical patterns of crime mechanism in the sphere of illegal weapon and ammunition turnover based upon major informative criminalistic elements, this particular article describes seven typical patterns of crime mechanism for the illegal storage, transportation, transfer, carry, purchase and sale, manufacture, repair or alteration, theft or extortion, careless storage or improper performance of duties on protection of weapon, its basic parts and ammunition. Each pattern is accompanied with the examples of judicial and investigative practice, followed by the necessary explanations and analysis of the activities of the subject of the investigation on the preparation, followup and final stages, which leads to the conclusion about the legitimacy of the proposed patterns
-
Description
The article questions of a legal regulation of standards of the family and civil legislation of guardianship establishment over minors, about implementation and protections of their rights, are considered the problems arising at practical realization of the relevant standards are considered
-
PLEDGE AND MORTGAGE UNDER THE INDIAN LAW
DescriptionThe article discusses the concept of species, the essential terms and the grounds of the pledge in Indian law, and especially the pledge agreement in the legal practice of India
-
PREREQUISITES FOR THE SECULARIZING REFORMS IN THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE
DescriptionThe article examines the process of secularization of Church property in the history of the world. Special attention is paid to the assumptions of the preparation of secularizing reforms in the Russian state since the policy of Joann III. We address the relationship between Church and state in the field of Church lands and ecclesiastical jurisdiction authorized in Stoglav in 1551, and in the judgment of the Council estates in 1581 and 1584. The article studies the reasons, under which it became necessary, in conditions of the emerging absolutism, to limit the Church's estates; the ecclesiastical jurisdiction in this connection, there was issued the national Code – “Sobornoye ulozheniye” of 1649. The study discusses the limitation of economic and administrative privileges of the Church in accordance with the Council code of Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich. The article focuses on the administrative and financial functions of the Monastic Order. We have also made a distinction, and there are differences in the powers between the Monastic Orders 1649 and between recreated Monastic Order in 1701. The article discusses the mission of the Church reform of Peter I the Great and the results of this reform, which prepared the legislative framework for the secularizing reforms of Catherine II the Great